协和4+4，反而让高考的含金量提升了

Core Viewpoint - The incident surrounding "Peking Union Medical College 4+4" highlights not only the exposure of malpractice in the medical field but also prompts a systemic reflection on the pathways for social mobility [1] Group 1: Medical Field Insights - The incident occurred in the medical field, which has traditionally been viewed as a "hardcore" discipline with high difficulty and minimal operational space, thus considered to have high value [5] - The perception that even the medical field, regarded as the most rigorous, can have operational space for manipulation is a significant shift in understanding [12] Group 2: Institutional Credibility - Peking Union Medical College has long been recognized as a prestigious institution, with its medical doctorate programs generally not questioned in terms of quality [11] - The recent events challenge the notion that even the most authoritative institutions are immune to issues of integrity [12] Group 3: Educational System Reflection - The 4+4 system, derived from the American medical education model, was initially seen as a progressive and mature approach to medical training [13][14] - Despite its perceived advantages, the system has been shown to have vulnerabilities that can be exploited [18] Group 4: Fairness in Education - The discussion raises critical questions about what constitutes a "good system," emphasizing that fairness is the foundational principle that should guide educational reforms [27] - The current educational system, particularly the college entrance examination, is viewed as a mechanism that ensures fairness, even amidst criticisms of its rigidity [20][21]