中方万千阻拦，莫迪还是“跪了”贝森特点名印度，对华立场很关键

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government, under the Trump administration, is reportedly pressuring over 70 countries to limit trade with China in exchange for tariff exemptions, which is seen as a form of economic coercion and unilateral bullying [1][3][5]. Group 1: U.S. Trade Policy - The U.S. is using tariffs as a tool to force other nations into compliance, promoting a narrative of "reciprocity" while actually engaging in hegemonic practices [1][3]. - The U.S. aims to create a coalition against China, expecting other countries to join in a trade war without bearing significant costs themselves [1][3]. - The potential for countries to comply with U.S. demands is low, as many view China as a more significant trade partner than the U.S. [1][3]. Group 2: Impact on Global Trade - China's position as the world's largest goods trader for eight consecutive years, with a market share of 14.7%, highlights the potential disruption caused by U.S. policies [3]. - The coercive tactics employed by the U.S. could lead to chaos in international trade and destabilize supply chains, with unpredictable consequences [3][5]. - A collective statement from over 100 economists warns that U.S. workers will be the first to suffer from the adverse effects of tariff policies, facing rising prices and economic downturns [3]. Group 3: China's Response - China firmly opposes any trade agreements that sacrifice its interests and is prepared to take reciprocal measures if pressured [5]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that there are no winners in a trade war and calls for dialogue based on equality and mutual respect [5][7]. - The Chinese stance is reinforced by a recent UN meeting attended by over 80 countries, discussing the impacts of unilateralism and bullying on international relations [5].