于东来事件，谁在逼着企业家沉默？

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the conflict between Yu Donglai, the founder of Pang Donglai, and the influencer Chai Duidui, which escalated in early May 2024 [1][4] - Chai Duidui accused Pang Donglai of making excessive profits from selling jade, claiming to have evidence to support this [2] - In response, Pang Donglai publicly shared sales data, pricing standards, and even sent products for third-party testing, promising refunds for quality issues [3][5] Group 2 - The conflict highlights a broader concern about the online environment where individuals can make unfounded accusations without accountability, raising questions about the sustainability of honest businesses [10][11] - The situation reflects a trend in the industry where companies are pressured to prove their integrity, often at the cost of revealing sensitive business information [12][15] - The article discusses the rise of a "negative information" economy, where negative content spreads faster and is more profitable than positive narratives [25][28] Group 3 - The current landscape of influencer marketing has shifted from "traffic is king" to a more aggressive model where emotional engagement drives revenue [19][21] - The article notes that 73% of internet users believe negative information spreads more quickly, indicating a systemic issue within social media platforms [25] - The phenomenon of "controversy equals traffic equals monetization" is prevalent, with capital backing strategies that exploit this dynamic [27][35] Group 4 - The article suggests that the silence of many entrepreneurs is a response to a hostile environment where speaking out can lead to further complications [38][49] - It emphasizes the need for a balanced commercial environment that protects businesses from malicious attacks while fostering a culture of accountability [52][62] - The case of Pang Donglai serves as a call to action for the industry to reflect on its practices and strive for a more ethical business model [51][64]