美联储重磅发声：终于明白，90天不是给别国缓冲，而是给美国续命

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the temporary nature of Trump's 90-day tariff suspension, suggesting it is merely a delay rather than a strategic adjustment, as it fails to address underlying economic issues [1][12][25] - The U.S. economy is facing significant challenges, with a reported GDP contraction of 0.3% year-over-year and a core inflation rate soaring to 6.2%, leading to increased costs for consumers [3][5][21] - Trump's insistence on continuing the tariff battle despite economic pressures raises concerns among economists about a potential 4% GDP decline and the long-term viability of such policies [5][10][23] Group 2 - The Federal Reserve's stance on maintaining high interest rates to combat inflation contrasts sharply with Trump's push for lower rates to stimulate the economy, creating a conflict in economic policy [10][18][23] - The looming pressure of $6 trillion in maturing U.S. debt in June exacerbates the financial situation, as the Treasury struggles to meet interest payments [10][18] - The article discusses the broader implications of the tariff policies, noting that 90% of tariff costs are borne by U.S. companies, which could lead to increased inflation and economic instability [14][23][25] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the interconnectedness of global trade, suggesting that the U.S. economy is increasingly reliant on China, particularly in terms of supply chain integrity [16][25] - The potential for a financial crisis due to debt defaults within the next 90 days is highlighted, indicating a precarious financial environment [19][21] - The ongoing struggles of American consumers and businesses due to rising costs and supply chain disruptions are underscored, with specific examples of increased prices for gasoline and housing [21][23]