印巴局势的J10C时刻，比Deepseek更大

Group 1 - The extreme control of public opinion in India is evident, with internal networks deleting discussions about losses and external platforms actively denying claims, showcasing a significant propaganda effort [2] - Indian military enthusiasts are aware of the situation and have moved discussions to underground channels, indicating a shift in understanding of China's electronic warfare capabilities, which are perceived to be superior to Russia's [2][3] - Pakistan's Vice Prime Minister and Foreign Minister stated that the J10C was responsible for the attacks, with global experts largely confirming this claim, highlighting India's struggle in the cognitive warfare arena [3] Group 2 - The significance of the J10C's performance is substantial, as it is a fourth and a half generation fighter priced at $70 million, compared to the $285 million cost of the downed French Rafale, raising questions about India's recent $7.5 billion order for 26 Rafales [3] - The cost-effectiveness of Chinese military products compared to Western counterparts is noted, with the potential for a ripple effect in the global arms market as countries reconsider their procurement strategies in light of recent events [5][6] - The outcome of the India-Pakistan conflict may lead to a reassessment of military orders from Russia and France, as countries do not want to invest heavily in systems that may prove ineffective against competitors like Pakistan [6] Group 3 - China's main fighter jet, the J20, is highlighted as being more powerful, with advanced missiles such as the PL-15 and PL-17, indicating a significant technological edge in aerial combat [4] - The ultimate military advantage of Western nations is being challenged, with the potential for a collapse of Western military hegemony as developing countries begin to adopt both Chinese and Western weapon systems [8] - The recent conflict serves as a practical test for these two military systems, suggesting that further real-world evaluations are likely, which could have profound implications for the global military landscape [8]