Workflow
依赖AI的第一个长假,我在路上堵老实了
Hu Xiu·2025-05-08 06:54

Core Viewpoint - The article explores the emerging trend of using AI for travel planning, highlighting both the advantages and limitations of AI travel assistants in creating itineraries and addressing user needs [4][103]. Group 1: AI Travel Planning Experience - Two writers tested various AI travel planning tools, including DeepSeek and Feizhu's "Ask" feature, to create travel itineraries for different locations [2][12]. - The experience revealed that while AI can generate travel plans quickly, it may misinterpret user requirements, leading to humorous or impractical suggestions [6][7][10]. - Users found that AI-generated itineraries often included real attractions, but the level of detail and accuracy varied between different AI tools [21][20]. Group 2: User Interaction with AI - Users experienced challenges in communicating with AI, particularly with DeepSeek, which required precise prompts for effective responses [48][49]. - Feizhu's "Ask" feature was noted for its user-friendly interface and practical functionalities, allowing for easier adjustments to travel plans [36][42]. - The article emphasizes the importance of real-time information updates for AI travel planning, as outdated or inaccurate data can lead to user frustration [60][84]. Group 3: AI Limitations and Future Potential - The article discusses the limitations of AI in providing reliable restaurant recommendations, with instances of AI-generated names not matching real establishments [50][54][58]. - Despite these limitations, there is a growing interest in AI travel planning, particularly among less experienced travelers who may benefit from automated itinerary generation [104][105]. - The potential for AI to cater to older travelers is highlighted, suggesting that as technology becomes more accessible, it could significantly enhance travel planning for this demographic [107][108].