开辟新战线！特朗普出手，可惜对中国没有用，欧洲却很不乐意

Core Viewpoint - Trump's new policy to impose a 100% tariff on foreign-made films entering the U.S. is seen as a continuation of his protectionist agenda, which may harm the domestic film industry rather than protect it [3][5]. Industry Impact - The proposed film tariff will significantly impact the U.S. film industry's supply chain, leading to increased production costs and potentially fewer films being produced, which could disrupt the entire industry ecosystem [5]. - Hollywood's reliance on overseas locations, special effects teams, and post-production services means that the tariff could lead to a substantial increase in production expenses, ultimately harming the film distribution business [5]. International Response - European lawmakers have expressed strong opposition to Trump's film tariff, labeling it as a form of trade protectionism. They warn that retaliatory measures could be taken, such as limiting U.S. film imports or imposing additional taxes on American films, which would severely affect Hollywood's international box office revenues [6]. - If Europe enacts countermeasures, it could diminish the influence of American films in European markets, leading to a significant reduction in international ticket sales [6]. Cultural Exchange - The implementation of a film tariff could hinder cultural exchange between nations, as films serve as vital cultural conduits. A retaliatory response could further weaken cultural penetration and influence [8]. - While the immediate impact on Chinese films may be limited due to their small market share in the U.S., the long-term effects of disrupted international cultural trade could destabilize the global film market [8]. Conclusion - Trump's approach to tariffs, particularly in the film industry, is viewed as a misguided attempt that may not yield the desired protective effects and could lead to greater isolation for the U.S. in the international market [9].