劳动者被企业包装成“自由职业者”，法院审理确认存在劳动关系

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that a worker, Wang, had an employment relationship with a repair company despite the existence of a service agreement that classified him as a "freelancer" [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Legal Relationship - The court emphasized the principle of "fact priority" in determining the legal relationship between companies and workers in new employment forms, focusing on actual rights and obligations [2] - Although Wang signed a service agreement with a crowdsourcing company, the court found that the actual working conditions indicated an employment relationship with the repair company [2][3] Group 2: Work Conditions - Wang was subject to attendance management by the repair company, working 8 hours a day and 40 hours a week, which aligns with the legal definition of employment [2][3] - The repair company determined Wang's pay and processed payments through the crowdsourcing company, indicating a lack of autonomy in his work [1][3] Group 3: Court's Conclusion - The court concluded that Wang's working conditions and payment structure demonstrated a clear dependency and economic subordination, fulfilling the criteria for an employment relationship [3] - The court confirmed the existence of an employment relationship between Wang and the repair company for the period from May 1, 2022, to November 1, 2022 [4]