被击穿的“事实”：经济学有态度，但不需要预设立场

Group 1 - The article emphasizes that economics should be based on reality and facts, rather than personal biases or predetermined stances [2][4][6] - It critiques the shifting opinions of economists, such as Yao Yang from Peking University, who changes his views on the real estate market based on prevailing conditions, indicating a lack of consistent analysis [4][6] - The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between subjective interpretations and objective analysis, as seen in the differing responses from AI models regarding China's economic growth [8] Group 2 - The article points out that a 5% economic growth rate in 2024 does not necessarily indicate that China is surpassing the US, as many core indicators are diverging [6][8] - It raises concerns about the implications of issuing 12 trillion yuan in long-term special bonds, suggesting that this may not reflect genuine economic recovery but rather a reliance on increased debt [6] - The piece warns against the dangers of AI potentially reinforcing biases and misinformation if left unchecked, highlighting the need for critical thinking in economic analysis [8]