Group 1 - The article discusses the security vulnerability of the Go1 robotic dog from Yushu Technology, which has a backdoor that allows hackers to manipulate user data and access video streams [1][8] - Yushu Technology confirmed the existence of the security flaw but stated that the Go1 model has been discontinued for two years, and subsequent versions are not affected [1][8] - The article highlights the growing concern that robotic pets, initially seen as innovative, may become tools for surveillance due to security issues [3][8] Group 2 - The nostalgia for electronic pets, such as Tamagotchi, is evident as they continue to attract consumers despite their simplicity compared to modern robotic pets [6][8] - Tamagotchi has maintained its market presence through continuous collaborations and has seen a rise in sales, indicating a strong emotional connection with consumers [8][12] - The article notes that the appeal of electronic pets lies in their low maintenance and emotional value, contrasting with the complexities of caring for real pets [17][19] Group 3 - The emergence of AI pets like Moflin and robotic dogs reflects a shift in consumer preferences towards interactive and emotionally engaging companions [28][39] - The article raises questions about the implications of relying on electronic pets for emotional support and the potential impact on human relationships [40][42] - The high cost of AI pets, often exceeding thousands of dollars, limits accessibility for many consumers, raising concerns about the sustainability of this market segment [42][45]
小学5元电子垃圾在名创优品联名卖200，傻瓜电子宠物机被买成宇树机器狗的平替？