Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-05-13 11:09Core Viewpoint - The statement from Cheung Kong Holdings emphasizes that any transactions related to the Hong Kong sale will be conducted legally and in compliance with regulations, which brings some relief to observers amid ongoing scrutiny and criticism [1]. Group 1: Company Response - Cheung Kong Holdings has remained largely silent in the face of intense public scrutiny over the past two months since the sale rumors emerged [2][3]. - Despite facing severe criticism from high-level officials, the company chose to respond with silence rather than engage in public discourse [4][5]. - On April 27, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued a directive stating that all parties involved in the Cheung Kong port transactions must not evade antitrust reviews [6][7]. Group 2: Historical Context - The article draws a parallel between Li Ka-shing and historical figures like Lü Buwei, highlighting the immense power and influence that both wielded in their respective eras [10]. - It reflects on the consequences of a merchant's ambition when intertwined with national interests, suggesting that even the most astute businessmen can miscalculate their positions [11][13]. - The narrative concludes with a philosophical reflection on the burdens of wealth and the importance of national identity, suggesting that Li Ka-shing, despite his success, must navigate the complexities of his heritage and responsibilities [15].