勤工俭学遭欠薪，维权用上民法典

Group 1 - The case highlights the challenges faced by university students in securing their labor rights when engaging in part-time work, particularly due to a lack of legal knowledge and experience [1][2] - The local prosecutor's office intervened to facilitate a resolution between the student and the restaurant company, emphasizing the legal obligations of employers to pay for services rendered [2] - The resolution involved a mediation process that resulted in the restaurant company paying the owed wages to the student, demonstrating the effectiveness of legal support in labor disputes [2][3] Group 2 - The Civil Code provides a framework for labor relations, defining the rights and obligations of both labor providers and employers, which can be established through verbal or written contracts [3] - In this case, the existence of a verbal agreement between the student and the restaurant company constituted a labor relationship under the Civil Code, allowing for legal recourse to claim unpaid wages [3] - The case underscores the importance of legal protections for vulnerable groups, such as students, in the labor market, and the role of the prosecutor's office in upholding these rights [2][3]