从“轻微免罚”看涉企执法方式转变（金台锐评）

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of "light penalties" in administrative law enforcement, which reflects a service-oriented approach that balances legal principles with governance wisdom, ultimately promoting high-quality development [1][2] - The implementation of service-oriented law enforcement allows for reasonable error tolerance for enterprises, enabling them to focus on production and environmental upgrades without the burden of administrative penalties [1][3] - The case studies presented highlight the effectiveness of this approach, such as the example of a company in Hangzhou that was exempted from penalties due to non-self-inflicted excess emissions, allowing it to invest more in sustainable practices [1][2] Group 2 - Service-oriented law enforcement should not only focus on avoiding penalties but also innovate enforcement methods to ensure healthy legal compliance within industries [2][3] - The "law enforcement + service" model transforms the relationship between regulatory bodies and enterprises into a partnership, fostering a culture of lawful operation [2][3] - Regulatory agencies are encouraged to utilize enforcement data to identify common issues across enterprises, leading to targeted measures that promote overall industry health [2][3] Group 3 - Service-oriented law enforcement is not about leniency but rather a balanced approach that demands higher standards from regulatory bodies, ensuring strict penalties for serious violations while allowing leniency for minor infractions [3] - The upcoming Private Economy Promotion Law mandates that administrative agencies minimize their impact on the normal operations of private enterprises, responding promptly to their legitimate requests [3] - The shift in enforcement methods aims to unify political, legal, and social outcomes, fostering a business environment where enterprises can thrive under a framework of regulation and support [3]