Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the house in question is considered joint property of the couple, but due to the short duration of their marriage and the circumstances surrounding the property transfer, the ownership is awarded to Zhao, with a compensation payment to Wang [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Context - The case is based on the interpretation of the "Civil Code" regarding marriage and family, which emphasizes the importance of property agreements between spouses [1][4]. - The court highlighted that the transfer of property ownership and the addition of a spouse's name are meant to support and secure the couple's shared life [4]. Group 2: Case Details - Zhao and Wang signed a prenuptial agreement stating that all property acquired before and during the marriage would be considered joint property, with each party holding a 50% share [1]. - After their marriage, Zhao gifted half of the property to Wang, and they registered the property jointly, which led to disputes during the divorce proceedings [2]. Group 3: Court's Decision - The court found that the house is Zhao's premarital property, and the gift to Wang was intended to facilitate their marriage, but the short duration of their cohabitation influenced the decision [2][4]. - The court determined that Zhao would compensate Wang with 20,000 yuan based on the house's assessed value of 160,000 yuan [2].
婚前房产婚后加名,离婚后要对半分吗?
Ren Min Wang·2025-05-15 01:09