年内暴跌19.14％，同类排名倒数第七！前海开源AI基金为何“反向操作”

Core Viewpoint - The artificial intelligence sector has attracted significant market attention this year, but the Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund's AI-themed products have underperformed amidst this technological revolution [2] Group 1: Fund Performance - From the beginning of the year to May 14, the Qianhai Kaiyuan AI-themed mixed fund A saw a net value decline of 19.14%, significantly underperforming the CSI Artificial Intelligence Index, which rose by 3.4% during the same period [2] - The Qianhai Kaiyuan AI-themed mixed fund C, established on January 20, also experienced a decline of 23.55% by May 14 [2] - The fund's poor performance is attributed to its strategy of betting on "dark horses" rather than focusing on leading companies in the AI sector, which is characterized by a "winner-takes-all" competition [3] Group 2: Investment Strategy - The fund's top ten holdings as of Q1 2025 included companies like Chipone Technology, Rockchip, and Hengxuan Technology, which collectively accounted for over 50% of its portfolio, excluding major players like Cambricon, Hikvision, and Inspur [3] - The strategy of investing in smaller chip companies, while they may have technological barriers, faces challenges such as high costs and complex ecosystem adaptations, leading to significant underperformance compared to industry giants [3] Group 3: Managerial Challenges - The fund underwent a complete overhaul of its top ten holdings by the end of Q1 2025, indicating a high turnover strategy that may have led to missed opportunities in leading stocks [4] - The fund manager, Qu Yang, has seen a significant decline in fund size, dropping from a peak of 60 billion yuan to 15.8 billion yuan, a reduction of over 70% [9] - The dual fund manager system, intended to balance experience and new perspectives, has faced challenges due to potential strategy conflicts, leading to increased volatility in fund performance [9][10] Group 4: Governance Issues - The unique three-way equity structure of Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund, involving state capital, private capital, and core employees, was initially seen as a model for governance but has raised concerns about concentrated power among decision-makers [11] - The dual role of Qu Yang as both the chairman of the equity investment decision committee and a general partner may lead to risks associated with excessive concentration of decision-making power [11]