最高检发布第四批贯彻实施民法典典型案例

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released the fourth batch of typical cases to demonstrate the effective implementation of the Civil Code, highlighting the role of procuratorial supervision in safeguarding legal rights and interests in various civil matters [1][2]. Group 1: Typical Cases Overview - The fourth batch of typical cases includes six cases covering various aspects of the Civil Code, such as divorce compensation, property rights, contract disputes, and personal rights [1][2]. - The cases illustrate the application of the Civil Code in real-life scenarios, emphasizing the importance of legal protections for individuals in family and property matters [1][2]. Group 2: Case Summaries - Case 1: Liu vs. Kang - In a divorce case, Liu was initially denied economic compensation due to lack of evidence. The procuratorial authority intervened, leading to a re-examination and a ruling that awarded Liu 80,000 yuan in compensation [5][7]. - Case 2: Yu vs. Shao - A contract dispute where a guardian sold property belonging to a mentally disabled person without proper consent. The procuratorial authority's intervention resulted in the court declaring the contract invalid, protecting the rights of the disabled individual [10][14]. - Case 3: Dong vs. Village Group - A land contract dispute where the court upheld the validity of contracts made without proper consent from the collective organization, leading to a procuratorial appeal that resulted in the contracts being declared invalid [18][24]. - Case 4: Jia vs. Jia - A labor injury case where the court initially ruled against the injured party. The procuratorial authority identified multiple layers of illegal subcontracting, leading to a re-trial that held all responsible parties liable for damages [26][31]. - Case 5: Wang vs. Children - A case involving elder care where the court's failure to enforce a maintenance order led to procuratorial intervention, resulting in the enforcement of the ruling and compliance from the children [34][36]. - Case 6: Zou vs. Knitting Company - A case of identity theft where the individual was wrongfully registered as a company official. The procuratorial authority supported the individual's claim to rectify the registration [38]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The cases collectively underscore the importance of the Civil Code in protecting individual rights, particularly in family law, property rights, and personal rights [1][2]. - The procuratorial authority's active role in supervising civil cases demonstrates a commitment to ensuring justice and upholding the rule of law [2][37].