刘晓庆再陷偷税风波？

Core Viewpoint - The recent tax evasion allegations against Liu Xiaoqing, a prominent figure in the entertainment industry, have reignited discussions about the social responsibilities of celebrities and the legal boundaries they must adhere to, especially given her past conviction for tax evasion in 2002 [1][7][22]. Group 1: Allegations and Background - Liu Xiaoqing is accused of tax evasion through her wholly-owned company, Shanghai Yixi Cultural Media Center, by issuing VAT invoices to evade personal income tax [2][22]. - The allegations include a loan of 3.3 million yuan from Liu Xiaoqing Jewelry (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. to a related enterprise, which was later funneled into her media company via a personal endorsement contract [2][22]. - The media company, registered in 2017 with a capital of only 30,000 yuan, is described as a "shell company" with no actual operations or employee records, yet it issued 42 VAT invoices totaling over 3 million yuan [2][22]. Group 2: Historical Context - Liu Xiaoqing previously served 422 days in prison for tax evasion amounting to 14.58 million yuan in 2002, which significantly damaged her public image and career [7][9]. - The past incident has created a heightened scrutiny of her current situation, as she has been previously penalized for tax-related issues [22]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The entertainment industry has been identified as a high-risk area for tax evasion, with numerous celebrities facing similar allegations in recent years, including high-profile cases like Fan Bingbing and Zheng Shuang [16][19][21]. - The ongoing issues reflect a broader problem within the industry regarding compliance with tax regulations, as many stars reportedly utilize various methods to evade taxes, undermining public trust and social equity [21][24]. Group 4: Public and Legal Reactions - Liu Xiaoqing has publicly denied the allegations, claiming no prior relationship with the accuser and labeling the claims as malicious [5][22]. - The Shanghai tax authority has accepted the case for investigation, which could lead to significant legal consequences if the allegations are substantiated [5][22].