Workflow
跨市场套利背后的定价密码:双重上市企业的价值发现逻辑
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-05-16 09:42

Core Insights - The phenomenon of price discrepancies between the same company's stock traded in different markets creates unique arbitrage opportunities, particularly for Chinese concept stocks dual-listed in the US and Hong Kong [1][3] - The divergence in pricing is primarily due to different risk perceptions among global investors, with US investors focusing on global competition and Hong Kong investors emphasizing local policies and funding preferences [1][3] - The efficiency of information transmission between markets is crucial for identifying arbitrage opportunities, as discrepancies often arise during significant policy announcements or earnings releases [3][5] Market Dynamics - Price differences between markets can reach 3%-8%, with instances where discrepancies persist above 5% for extended periods, attracting institutional investors to engage in arbitrage [1][3] - The impact of external factors such as currency fluctuations and short-selling costs can significantly affect theoretical returns, with a reported 40% increase in arbitrage hedging costs during the 2023 Federal Reserve interest rate hike cycle [3][5] - Regulatory differences between the US and Hong Kong, particularly in information disclosure, can lead to valuation misalignments, as seen with a specific electric vehicle company facing discrepancies in carbon emission data reporting [3][5] Investment Strategies - To effectively capture arbitrage opportunities, investors need to utilize tools that provide insights into market dynamics, including real-time monitoring of cross-market capital flows and analysis of institutional trading data [3][5] - Advanced analytical platforms are being developed to identify historical price convergence patterns and construct warning models based on volatility indices and short-selling ratios in Hong Kong [3][5] - Establishing a multi-dimensional monitoring framework is essential for understanding pricing anchors in different markets and mitigating losses from institutional frictions [5]