CSC(601066) 2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao·2025-05-17 08:45Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the trend of securities firms changing the management of their public fund products to avoid liquidation and enhance competitiveness, particularly as the deadline for contracts approaches [1][2]. Group 1: Changes in Management - At least six securities firms have submitted applications to change the management of nearly 50 public fund products this year, including major firms like GF Asset Management and CITIC Securities [1]. - CITIC Securities Asset Management has proposed changing the management of 17 public fund products to Huaxia Fund, which has been accepted by regulators [1][4]. - The management changes are primarily being made to comply with regulatory requirements and to avoid product liquidation [2][6]. Group 2: Strategic Considerations - The shift to management by affiliated public fund companies is driven by regulatory compliance, resource complementarity, and strategic business adjustments [6][7]. - Securities firms are focusing on private equity and high-value areas, while transferring public fund products to optimize resource allocation [7]. Group 3: Performance and Market Position - Public fund products have struggled to stand out in performance, with many having small management scales; nearly a quarter of these products manage less than 100 million yuan [10][11]. - The article highlights that the performance of public fund products is often hindered by differences in investment strategies and insufficient research resources compared to established public funds [11]. Group 4: Future Trends in Asset Management - Major securities firms plan to continue applying for public fund licenses and establishing asset management subsidiaries, while also enhancing their product lines and research teams [12][13]. - There is a focus on international business expansion, with firms aiming to develop diverse investment strategies and improve cross-border service processes [13].