中美谈判后，李嘉诚180度转弯，不合法情况下，不可能出售港口？

Group 1 - Li Ka-shing's company, CK Hutchison Holdings, initially planned to sell 43 ports to BlackRock, including two strategically important ports in the Panama Canal, which could strengthen U.S. leverage against China [2][4] - The sale was seen as a move to curry favor with the U.S. amid escalating U.S.-China tensions, particularly given the strategic significance of the ports for trade between China and the Americas [2][4] - Following the announcement, the Chinese government quickly initiated a review process to prevent the sale, indicating the ports' importance to national interests [6] Group 2 - A sudden shift occurred when the U.S. and China reached an agreement to lower tariffs to 10%, which was a significant concession from the U.S. side, previously imposing much higher tariffs [9][11] - The agreement was seen as a potential stabilizing factor for trade relations, with implications for other countries observing the U.S.-China dynamic [11] - The Chinese government's strong response to the initial sale proposal, coupled with the tariff agreement, led to Li Ka-shing's decision to abandon the port sale, reflecting a change in strategy [12][14] Group 3 - The Chinese government criticized the idea of selling the ports to the U.S., suggesting that such actions would be viewed unfavorably by the Chinese public and could be seen as capitulation [14][16] - The commentary from Chinese officials emphasized the need for businesses to resist external pressures and not to compromise national interests [16] - The overall situation illustrates the complex interplay between corporate decisions and national policy, particularly in the context of U.S.-China relations [16]