租房约定“禁养宠物”，租客养猫被法院判决支付违约金及损失

Group 1 - The case involves a rental contract dispute due to pet ownership, where the court upheld the "no pets" clause as a valid term to protect the rental property [1][2] - The court ruled that damages caused by the pet, such as structural damage to furniture and cleaning costs, were not considered normal wear and tear, thus the landlord was entitled to compensation [2] - The final judgment required the tenant to pay a total of 14,000 yuan in damages and penalties, which included a reduced penalty of 1,000 yuan for breach of contract [3] Group 2 - The court emphasized the principle of "necessity + reasonableness" in determining damages, allowing for compensation only for actual losses incurred [2] - The court rejected the landlord's claim for tax fees, stating that the rental agreement's provision for the tenant to bear tax fees constituted double charging, as the rent already included these fees [2] - The tenant's appeal was dismissed, and the original ruling was upheld by the appellate court, making the judgment final [3]