别以为会用AI就安全了，真正的危机是技能贬值

Core Insights - The article emphasizes that the real challenge in the AI era is not merely about using AI tools but understanding how AI fundamentally reshapes work structures and organizational logic [3][17][66] - It argues that many common beliefs about AI's impact on work are misleading, as they focus on task-level improvements rather than systemic changes [4][18][45] Group 1: Misconceptions about AI - Misconception 1: Learning to use AI will keep individuals ahead. The article critiques this view as it overlooks the broader systemic changes that AI brings [4][18] - Misconception 2: AI allows individuals to do more work, thus increasing their value. However, this assumes that the work system remains unchanged, which is often not the case [18][20] - Misconception 3: Jobs will not disappear, only the way work is done will change. The article argues that jobs are not inherently fixed and can be redefined by changes in the system [24][28] Group 2: Systemic Changes and Value Creation - The article highlights that the true value in the AI era comes from understanding the new system dynamics rather than just optimizing existing tasks [10][15] - It points out that as productivity increases, the benefits may not flow to the workers but rather to those who control the new systems, leading to a disconnect between value creation and compensation [19][23] - The article stresses that AI is not just a tool but a force that redistributes power within organizations, changing who makes decisions and how tasks are executed [45][48] Group 3: The Future of Work - The article suggests that the future of work will require individuals to rethink their roles and the relevance of their skills in a rapidly evolving system [30][41] - It warns that simply being faster at using AI does not guarantee job security, as the underlying value systems may no longer reward those skills [32][38] - The article concludes that organizations must not just integrate AI into existing frameworks but fundamentally rethink their operational structures to remain competitive [62][66]