安路科技: 北京市金杜律师事务所上海分所关于上海安路信息科技股份有限公司2024年年度股东大会之法律意见书

Group 1 - The legal opinion letter was issued by King & Wood Mallesons Shanghai Office regarding the 2024 annual general meeting of Shanghai Anlu Information Technology Co., Ltd. [1][2] - The law firm confirmed that the company provided all necessary documents and information for the issuance of the legal opinion, ensuring no concealment or misrepresentation occurred [1][2] - The legal opinion focuses on the procedures for convening and holding the shareholders' meeting, the qualifications of attendees, and the voting procedures and results [2][3] Group 2 - The shareholders' meeting was convened on May 20, 2025, in accordance with the company's articles of association and relevant regulations [3][4] - The meeting was held at the company's conference room and was presided over by the chairman, Mr. Xie Wenlu [4][5] - The actual time, location, and agenda of the meeting matched the prior announcements made in the official notifications [5][6] Group 3 - A total of 77 participants attended the meeting, representing 270,417,872 shares, which accounted for 67.4612% of the total voting shares [6][7] - The qualifications of the attendees were verified, confirming compliance with legal and regulatory requirements [6][7] - The meeting was convened by the company's board of directors, which met the necessary qualifications [6][7] Group 4 - The voting procedures followed the announced agenda without any modifications or new proposals introduced [7][8] - The results of the voting indicated that all proposed resolutions were passed with significant majority support [8][9] - The voting results showed that minority investors overwhelmingly supported the resolutions, with approval rates exceeding 99% for several proposals [9][10] Group 5 - The legal opinion concluded that the convening and holding of the shareholders' meeting complied with the Company Law, Securities Law, and relevant regulations [10][11] - The qualifications of the attendees and the conveners were deemed valid, and the voting procedures and results were confirmed as legal and effective [11]