特朗普盟友、美国前副总统“炮轰”特朗普：真是个“疯子”！

Core Viewpoint - Dan Quayle expresses skepticism about Trump's handling of U.S.-Russia relations and the Ukraine conflict, suggesting that Putin has no intention of ending the conflict before achieving his goals in Ukraine [1][2]. Group 1: U.S.-Russia Relations - Quayle criticizes Trump's approach, stating that Trump has not applied any pressure on Putin and has failed to leverage any negotiating chips [1][2]. - He believes that the lack of pressure on Russia undermines the U.S.-EU policy alliance and suggests that secondary sanctions should be considered if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire [2]. Group 2: Ukraine Conflict - Quayle asserts that Putin's ultimate goal is to destabilize Ukraine, and he has been successful in manipulating Trump's weaknesses [2][3]. - He identifies three potential actions that could pressure Putin to return to the negotiating table: utilizing Russian funds in Swiss banks for Ukraine, providing more weapons to Ukraine, and implementing secondary sanctions against Russia [2][3]. Group 3: Political Implications - Quayle warns that if Trump is perceived as a failure in the Ukraine conflict, it could have significant political repercussions for him [3]. - He emphasizes that while Americans dislike conflict, they also dislike losing, indicating that Trump's handling of the situation could impact his political capital [3]. Group 4: Economic Impact - Quayle expresses confusion over Trump's tariff strategy, suggesting it lacks coherence and could lead to long-term inflation due to delayed capital expenditures and disrupted supply chains [4].