Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Commerce issued a guideline stating that using Huawei's Ascend chips globally violates U.S. export control regulations, later adjusting the wording to warn the industry about the risks of using advanced Chinese computing chips, including specific Huawei products [1][2] - The essence of the U.S. policy is to impose its domestic power on the global market, aiming to block China's high-performance computing chips and prevent its participation in the global supply chain, thereby forcing global companies to continue relying on U.S. chips [1][3] - The U.S. interference extends to Chinese companies using domestically produced chips within China, which is seen as a severe disregard for the development rights of over 1.4 billion people [1][4] Group 2 - Despite U.S. attempts to hinder progress, Chinese tech companies like Huawei and Xiaomi are making significant advancements, such as the launch of the new HarmonyOS computer and the commencement of 3nm chip production, indicating a shift away from reliance on Western companies [2][3] - The narrative that China's technological development aims to "replace the U.S." is viewed as unfounded speculation, as China's tech advancements are primarily focused on domestic economic modernization and improving living standards [2][4] - China's development model promotes a cooperative approach to global technology, offering competitive products while advocating for a shared growth philosophy, which counters the zero-sum game mentality [3][4] Group 3 - The global semiconductor supply chain is highly interconnected, with various countries, including the Netherlands, Japan, and the U.S., deeply tied to the Chinese market, making U.S. attempts to impose restrictions counterproductive [3][4] - The 21st century is characterized by multipolarity and economic globalization, where inclusive and equitable development is seen as the path to mutual success, contrasting with outdated win-lose thinking [4]
社评:高科技这个赛道,美国靠“下绊子”赢不了