Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the alteration of a kitchen space by Zhu, which led to the emission of cooking fumes affecting the living conditions of Che [1][2] - The court found that Zhu's modification of the kitchen and the connection of the exhaust pipe to a non-designated vent posed safety risks and infringed upon Che's rights [1][3] - The court's decision mandated Zhu to restore the kitchen to its original state and seal the hole made in the wall for the vent within thirty days of the ruling [1][3] Group 2 - The Civil Code stipulates that neighboring property rights should be managed based on principles of mutual benefit and fairness, but disputes can be complex and require on-site assessments for evidence [2] - The court conducted an on-site inspection to determine the impact of the fumes, which was confirmed by the presence of cooking odors in Che's apartment during the test [2][3] - The ruling emphasized that courts can utilize on-site inspections and experiments to establish evidence when parties face difficulties in proving claims related to neighboring damages [3]
被邻居油烟呛该怎么证明？法官现场炒辣椒查明事实（以案说法）
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-05-21 21:59