丁一凡：面对毫无信誉的美国政府，我们不宜“得饶人处且饶人”

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the recent US-China trade negotiations, which resulted in a temporary suspension of tariffs and a reduction of certain tariffs, signaling a potential easing of trade tensions between the two countries [1][17] - The negotiations progressed faster than expected, with the US agreeing to only a 10% base tariff instead of the previously proposed 145% [1][4] - The US's approach to the negotiations reflects a sense of urgency from the Trump administration, as they seek to find a way to ease trade tensions without incurring further economic damage [2][5] Group 2 - The current trade situation is characterized by a significant imbalance, with the US imposing additional tariffs on China under the pretext of issues like fentanyl, which complicates the negotiation landscape [4][5] - The upcoming 90-day suspension period is seen as a critical window for China to leverage the US's impending debt crisis as a bargaining chip in future negotiations [10][11] - China's strategy in the negotiations is to maintain a strong position, recognizing that the trade war has impacted the US more significantly than it has affected China [5][17] Group 3 - The historical context of the negotiations indicates that previous experiences with the Trump administration have equipped China with better strategies to handle potential future confrontations [13][14] - The reliance of the US on Chinese supply chains, particularly in areas like rare earth materials, gives China leverage in the negotiations [14] - The overall sentiment is that while the recent negotiations represent a temporary victory for China, there remains a high level of uncertainty regarding future interactions with the Trump administration [9][17]