Workflow
靠“人工AI”骗到5亿美元?这家用印度程序员假冒AI的“独角兽”官宣破产:没钱了,还倒欠微软和亚马逊1.15亿美元
3 6 Ke·2025-05-22 11:38

Core Insights - Builder.ai, once valued at $1 billion, has declared bankruptcy, with debts exceeding $115 million owed to Microsoft and Amazon [1][7][9] - The company's business model was criticized for relying heavily on human labor rather than actual AI technology, leading to allegations of being a "fake AI platform" [3][5][11] - Despite raising nearly $500 million in funding, Builder.ai's operational costs far exceeded its revenue, with daily expenses estimated at over $500,000 [6][9][10] Company Overview - Builder.ai was founded in 2016 in the UK, initially named Engineer.ai, and launched its first AI platform product in 2017 [3] - The company claimed to offer a no-code app development platform that could reduce development costs to one-third of traditional methods and double the speed [3][4] - The platform's actual development was largely performed by low-cost engineers in India, contradicting its AI-driven claims [4][5] Financial Performance - Builder.ai raised significant funding, including $250 million in May 2023 and $50 million from debt markets in October 2024 [6] - The company reported revenue of £23 million for the fiscal year ending March 2023, covering less than 9% of its daily operational expenses [9][10] - The company faced severe cash flow issues, with only $7 million in cash reserves when the new CEO took over in March 2025 [10] Leadership and Management Issues - Sachin Dev Duggal resigned as CEO in March 2025, with Manpreet Ratia taking over amid ongoing financial struggles [10] - The company attempted to cut costs by laying off employees but ultimately failed to recover from its financial burdens [10][11] Industry Context - Builder.ai's downfall highlights the risks associated with the AI investment boom, where many companies may lack genuine technological foundations [11][12] - The situation serves as a cautionary tale for investors and developers, emphasizing the need for a return to practical, technology-driven solutions rather than speculative ventures [11][12]