“特朗普想全盘赢中国，唯独这个战场主动认输”

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration is shifting its focus away from clean energy competition with China, instead prioritizing traditional energy sources like oil, natural gas, and coal, leading to significant internal divisions within the Republican Party regarding energy policy [1][3]. Group 1: Energy Policy Shifts - The Trump administration's strategy reflects a "zero-sum" mindset, believing that further investment in clean energy would only benefit China, which dominates key segments of the global supply chain for batteries, electric vehicles, solar, and wind energy [3][5]. - In contrast to the first term's broad approach to energy policy, the second term shows a clear preference for fossil fuels, with Trump expressing intentions to repeal parts of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to cut government spending [3][4]. Group 2: Internal Republican Divisions - The proposed "Big Beautiful Bill Act" is causing fundamental disagreements within the Republican Party, particularly between hardliners who want to eliminate clean energy subsidies and moderates who recognize the benefits of these subsidies for their communities [1][7]. - The hardline stance may alienate moderate Republicans, as many of their constituents benefit from the jobs created by clean energy projects supported by the IRA [7][9]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The cancellation of clean energy subsidies could jeopardize approximately 160,000 jobs in the U.S. manufacturing sector, particularly in Republican-majority areas [5][6]. - A study indicates that the elimination of these subsidies could result in the loss of a projected $50 billion solar component and battery export market by 2030, with other countries likely filling the investment gap left by the U.S. [6][9]. Group 4: Global Cooperation and Climate Change - The current U.S. administration's approach is seen as detrimental to global efforts to combat climate change, as it undermines the need for international collaboration [9][10]. - The article emphasizes that addressing climate change requires collective action from all nations, rather than a retreat from engagement due to perceived competition with China [9][10].