用“最笨”的办法，解最硬的结

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute regarding the responsibility for roof repairs in a residential building, highlighting the complexities of shared property ownership and the use of public maintenance funds. Group 1: Legal Dispute Overview - A resident, Mr. Li, is seeking compensation from the property management for roof repair costs amounting to over 19,000 yuan due to persistent leaks [2][3] - The judge, Wang Xiaxia, is mediating the case and has noted the shared ownership of the roof among all homeowners, complicating the determination of responsibility [3][4] Group 2: Mediation Efforts - The judge suggests considering the use of the building's public maintenance fund to cover the repair costs, aiming for a resolution that is acceptable to both parties [4][5] - Despite the judge's efforts to facilitate a settlement, the property management remains hesitant, and the situation is further complicated by the need for a professional assessment of the leak [3][5] Group 3: Community Engagement - The judge conducts a community education session to clarify homeowners' rights and responsibilities regarding shared property maintenance, which is crucial for gaining support for the proposed solution [10][11] - Following the educational efforts, a significant number of homeowners begin to support the use of the public maintenance fund, with two-thirds agreeing to sign, meeting the minimum requirement for fund usage [10][11]