收拾了司马南之后，民营经济促进法实施了

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the "Private Economy Promotion Law" marks a significant step in the legal protection of China's private economy, addressing issues highlighted by the tax evasion case of public figure Si Manan, and symbolizing a dual calibration of law and morality [2][6]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Implications - The law provides systematic protection for the rights of private enterprises and their operators, explicitly prohibiting online insults and defamation, thus establishing a legal shield against rumors [3][4]. - It includes 78 articles aimed at reconstructing the ecosystem of the private economy, addressing issues such as the abuse of administrative or criminal means in economic disputes and establishing a mechanism for inter-regional law enforcement cooperation to curb local protectionism [4][5]. - The law introduces a nationwide negative list system for market access, ensuring that areas not on the list are open for entry, thereby eliminating hidden discrimination in bidding and government procurement processes [4][5]. Group 2: Economic and Operational Support - The law mandates that state agencies and state-owned enterprises adhere strictly to contract obligations, preventing delays in payments under various pretexts, and establishes a payment guarantee mechanism [5]. - It emphasizes the importance of smooth communication between government and enterprises, incorporating the concept of "clean and clear" government-business relations into the legal framework [5]. - The law supports private enterprises in leading major national technological initiatives, opens up major research infrastructure, and strengthens punitive damages for intellectual property rights violations, aiming to enhance the innovative potential of private enterprises [5]. Group 3: Challenges and Future Outlook - Despite the law's significance, its effective implementation faces challenges, including potential resistance from local governments due to entrenched interests and path dependencies [5]. - The governance structure of small and medium-sized enterprises may hinder the law's effectiveness, necessitating supportive policies to enhance compliance awareness [5]. - The ongoing influence of "flow-based" business practices requires continued efforts to combat the "patriotic business" industry chain and promote a rational public perception of the social value of private enterprises [5][6].