推广非现场执法，这些“欠账”补起来！

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the increasing adoption of non-site law enforcement in ecological environment regulation, highlighting its advantages over traditional enforcement methods and the need for improvements in infrastructure and personnel training to maximize its effectiveness [1][2]. Group 1: Advantages of Non-Site Law Enforcement - Non-site law enforcement significantly enhances regulatory coverage, allowing limited enforcement resources to achieve greater effectiveness [1]. - It utilizes technology to secure evidence, reducing human intervention and minimizing arbitrary enforcement issues [1]. - The approach enables real-time monitoring of corporate emissions and data analysis to predict environmental risks, facilitating a shift towards more precise and intelligent ecological governance [1]. Group 2: Challenges and Recommendations - Current challenges include insufficient monitoring equipment coverage, weak data system support, and inadequate capabilities of enforcement personnel [1]. - Recommendations include expanding monitoring network coverage and enhancing the intelligence level of online monitoring systems, ensuring high-quality standards in equipment procurement and installation [2]. - There is a call for the establishment of a reliable anti-cheating network to prevent companies from evading regulation through data manipulation [2].