Workflow
作为一名教育工作者,对于“查AI特征含量”我是不以为然的
Hu Xiu·2025-05-24 00:19

Group 1 - The article discusses the emerging trend of universities requiring students to submit AI feature content in their theses, indicating a growing concern over the use of AI in academic work [4][6][12] - This trend has potentially created a new revenue stream for companies like CNKI, which is part of Tongfang Co., as students increasingly pay for AI detection services [5][20] - Some universities have set strict limits on acceptable AI feature content, with some requiring it to be below 15% for undergraduate papers, leading to the emergence of services that help students reduce AI content [17][19] Group 2 - The reliability of AI detection tools is questioned, as many AI vendors are hesitant to definitively state that a piece of work was generated by AI, often only providing a percentage of AI feature content [13][21] - The article compares the process of checking AI content to the role of interns in research and writing, suggesting that the core skill in journalism and academic writing is the ability to ask the right questions rather than the method of content generation [32][34] - Concerns about AI in academia echo past fears regarding internet addiction, highlighting a historical pattern of anxiety surrounding new technologies [46][50]