这是美国国内金融资本的一场暗战，特朗普禁止哈佛招收国际生

Group 1 - The core argument revolves around the conflict between Trump and Harvard, which symbolizes a deeper struggle involving global financial capital and the survival of U.S. debt [1][5][10] - Harvard is described as a giant hedge fund, with its endowment functioning as a significant player in the global financial market, utilizing complex investment strategies to achieve excess returns [3][5] - Trump's criticism of Harvard is not merely about educational policies but reflects a broader challenge to the influence of financial capital on U.S. politics and economics [5][6][8] Group 2 - The discussion includes contrasting views on U.S. debt management, with one perspective advocating for extending debt duration while another suggests aggressive measures like currency devaluation and high inflation to alleviate debt pressure [5][6] - The concept of credit sovereignty is introduced, highlighting the struggle for control over the dollar's expansion and asset pricing, with Trump representing national interests against financial capital [6][8] - The current crisis in the U.S. is characterized by financial capital undermining the dollar's credit system, raising questions about the future stability of the U.S. financial framework [10]