Group 1 - The core issue is the urgency for the U.S. to finalize trade agreements with other countries before the 90-day tariff suspension expires, as failure to do so could lead to significant market declines [1][4] - Currently, only the UK and China have signed agreements with the U.S., leaving other major economies unaddressed [1] - Trump's aggressive stance towards the EU includes a proposed 50% tariff increase, while he shows signs of compromise with Japan [3][17] Group 2 - Japan's Prime Minister, Shigeru Ishiba, has taken a firm stance against U.S. tariffs, indicating that Japan will not sacrifice its national interests for trade negotiations [6][11] - The U.S. has shown a willingness to negotiate with Japan, as evidenced by Trump's approval of a partnership between U.S. and Japanese steel companies, which marks a significant shift in U.S. policy [11][13] - Japan's current approach to trade negotiations has yielded positive outcomes, suggesting that a tougher stance against the U.S. may be beneficial [8][13] Group 3 - The EU's response to U.S. tariffs has been characterized by internal divisions, making it difficult for the bloc to present a united front [13][15] - Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on €95 billion worth of EU goods if negotiations fail, indicating a high-stakes environment for transatlantic trade [19] - Despite U.S. pressure, the EU has stated it will not decouple from China, maintaining its existing trade policies [20][22]
欧盟倒向中国?美国施压起反作用?特朗普示好日本!中国成赢家?
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-05-25 04:19