“特朗普币”晚宴槽点拉满：食物糟糕、安保松懈、总统仅露面23分钟！

Core Insights - The event hosted by Trump for the largest buyers of his meme coin "Trump Coin" ($TRUMP) was attended by 220 guests, including notable figures from the cryptocurrency industry and former NBA star Lamar Odom, but the coin's price dropped by 16% shortly after the event [1][2] - The largest holder of "Trump Coin," Sun Yuchen, is facing SEC fraud charges and has invested $75 million in Trump's cryptocurrency project [2][3] - The event sparked protests outside, highlighting concerns from lawmakers about cryptocurrency corruption and the implications of Trump's involvement in the crypto space [3][4] Group 1: Event Details - The dinner was marketed as "the most exclusive invitation in the world," with attendees spending approximately $148 million to participate [1] - Attendees reported a lack of engagement from Trump, who only stayed for 23 minutes and did not interact with most guests [2] - The atmosphere at the event was described as subdued, with many attendees checking the price of "Trump Coin" during dinner [2] Group 2: Regulatory Implications - The event raised alarms among lawmakers, with a bipartisan effort to introduce new legislation aimed at regulating cryptocurrency, specifically targeting the potential corruption associated with Trump's crypto ventures [6][7] - The GENIUS Act, which aims to regulate stablecoins, faces challenges due to controversial amendments and political tensions surrounding Trump's cryptocurrency activities [7] - Major banks are in preliminary talks to issue a unified dollar stablecoin, but the progress of the GENIUS Act is critical for these plans [7] Group 3: Market Impact - Since its launch, "Trump Coin" has generated over $324 million in transaction fees, with approximately 80% of the token supply controlled by Trump's group [9] - The Trump family's cryptocurrency project, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), has raised $550 million, indicating significant financial backing in the crypto space [9][11] - The potential for stablecoin legislation to create substantial demand for U.S. debt is highlighted, with expectations of bipartisan support for regulatory clarity [10]