特朗普喊话访华，王毅已在北京密会美国贵客，12州反水起诉白宫

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unprecedented "triple variation" in China-U.S. relations as of 2025, highlighting the contrasting approaches of the Trump administration and China's diplomatic responses [1][3]. Group 1: Diplomatic Engagements - Trump has expressed willingness to visit China to discuss economic and diplomatic issues, yet China has not formally responded, emphasizing the need for equal respect and formal diplomatic processes [3]. - Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's meeting with U.S. Asia Society President Kevin Rudd signals a nuanced approach, welcoming unofficial communication while criticizing U.S. hegemonic actions [5]. - The dual communication channels established by China, involving both unofficial and official dialogues, reflect a mature and restrained diplomatic strategy [5]. Group 2: Legal and Economic Implications - A coalition of 12 U.S. states has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing it of illegally imposing tariffs under the guise of a national emergency, which could have significant economic repercussions [7]. - The economic impact of tariffs is highlighted, with the coalition representing 30% to 40% of U.S. GDP, indicating that the costs of tariffs ultimately fall on American consumers and businesses [7]. - The lawsuit represents a structural conflict between federal and state powers, as the Constitution grants tariff authority to Congress, while Trump has used emergency declarations to bypass legislative processes [9]. Group 3: Future Trends in China-U.S. Relations - The article predicts three major trends in the ongoing China-U.S. competition: an escalation of the tech war, the normalization of tariff conflicts, and a restructuring of global order through China's initiatives like the "BRICS+" mechanism [11]. - China's advancements in self-innovation in areas like 5G and rare earths are expected to mitigate the effects of U.S. technological restrictions [11]. - The article concludes that if the Trump administration continues its tariff-centric approach, it may ultimately find itself isolated in the evolving global landscape [11].