中国行，印度也行？中美谈妥后，印也硬刚美国加税，结果几天滑跪

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is that the recent trade agreement between China and the U.S. has temporarily eased global trade tensions, while India's attempt to adopt a similar hardline stance against the U.S. quickly backfired, highlighting the complexities of international trade dynamics [1][3][6] - The trade agreement signed in May 2025 between China and the U.S. reduced tariffs back to 10% and prevented further tax increases, which was seen as a significant diplomatic win for China [1][3] - India's initial response to the China-U.S. agreement was to announce tariffs on U.S. goods, reflecting a desire to exert pressure on the U.S. regarding high tariffs on Indian steel and aluminum, which cost India $1.91 billion annually [3][5] Group 2 - India's attempt to adopt a hardline approach was influenced by domestic political pressures, particularly with the upcoming 2024 elections, where a strong international stance could boost voter support [5][6] - The trade relationship between India and the U.S. is imbalanced, with India's exports primarily consisting of agricultural and low-end manufactured goods, making it vulnerable to U.S. retaliation [5][6] - India's rapid shift from a hardline stance to a more conciliatory approach within two days indicates the economic limitations it faces in engaging in a prolonged trade conflict with the U.S. [6][8] Group 3 - The incident serves as a lesson for India, emphasizing that international trade success cannot solely rely on mimicking other countries' strategies, as India's lack of sufficient leverage against the U.S. became evident [8] - The need for India to strengthen its domestic economy and supply chain capabilities is crucial for establishing a more assertive position in international trade [8]