聚焦准确认定“现实危险” 以法治思维推进安全生产治理

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released a batch of six typical cases related to dangerous operations to enhance business guidance on criminal cases that endanger production safety [1][3] - The cases cover three types of violations of safety management regulations as stipulated in Article 134 of the Criminal Law, spanning four high-risk industry sectors: offshore operations, metal smelting, light industry manufacturing, and the management, storage, and transportation of hazardous chemicals [1][2] - These typical cases aim to refine the standards for determining the reality, urgency, and severity of dangers, accurately identifying "real dangers" while showcasing good practices by procuratorial agencies in handling such cases [1][3] Group 2 - In the case of Zhao and Zhang, the procuratorial agency conducted a substantive review of the "real danger" assessment provided by emergency management departments, determining that the defendants' actions created a general reality of danger due to the use of non-compliant equipment and illegal storage and transportation of diesel [2] - The case of Wang involved on-site inspections and expert consultations to assess the likelihood of explosions due to improper storage of liquefied gas, leading to the recognition of a causal relationship between the illegal actions and the real danger [2] - The head of the Major Crime Procuratorial Department emphasized that these cases serve as a model for unifying judicial standards and accurately combating crimes in related fields, with plans to intensify efforts against criminal activities that endanger production safety [3]