打四年游戏和背四年名词解释，哪个更浪费生命

Group 1 - The article discusses the shift in perception regarding video games and their impact on education, suggesting that the correlation between gaming and academic performance is not straightforward [2][8] - It argues for a more liberal approach to gaming, emphasizing that individuals with strong self-discipline are more likely to succeed regardless of their gaming habits [2][4] - The gaming industry is highlighted as a sector where effort can lead to significant rewards, contrasting with traditional academic paths that may not yield practical skills or knowledge [7][9] Group 2 - The article points out that the gaming industry offers numerous job opportunities, often with higher salaries compared to traditional sectors, and values long-term understanding of games over short-term academic achievements [7][8] - It critiques the current educational system for fostering a competitive environment that may lead to mental health issues among students, particularly when the focus is on rote memorization rather than practical skills [9] - The discussion includes the notion that investing time in gaming can be more beneficial than traditional studying methods, as it may lead to better career prospects in the gaming industry [9][10]