2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao·2025-05-28 09:51Core Viewpoint - The report evaluates the minor protection mechanisms in 20 mobile games, highlighting improvements in anti-addiction systems and the introduction of social protection measures for minors [1][4][9]. Group 1: Overview of Evaluation - The average score for the 20 evaluated mobile games is 78.30, with the highest scores being 95 for "Honor of Kings" and "Minecraft," and the lowest being 68 for "Under the Cloud" and "Happy Elimination" [4][9]. - The evaluation process involved simulating the actual gaming experience of minors, assessing the anti-addiction mechanisms at different stages: before, during, and after gameplay [4][9]. Group 2: Implementation of Anti-Addiction Measures - All 20 games implemented real-name authentication and age-appropriate restrictions, with 100% compliance in displaying user agreements and age warnings before gameplay [10][11]. - The games enforce time limits for minors, ensuring they can only play during designated hours, and restrict in-game purchases based on age [21][22]. Group 3: Social Protection Mechanisms - The evaluation introduced a focus on social protection mechanisms, addressing the risks minors face in online interactions, such as exposure to harmful content and privacy breaches [2][3][30]. - Most games provide features to block specific users and strangers, but less than half offer options to hide personal game information from unknown players [34]. Group 4: Customer Support Accessibility - The majority of the evaluated games (19 out of 20) have easily accessible customer support, allowing players to reach out for help within five steps [23][25]. - Improvements were noted in the handling of minor refund requests, with only 2 games requiring external channels for processing, down from 9 in the previous evaluation [28].