这场事关中国和全球的官司，美国政府输了！

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that the tariffs imposed by the U.S. government on over 180 countries under the "Liberation Day" initiative and those on China, Canada, and Mexico related to fentanyl issues are illegal, as the President does not have the authority to impose such tariffs unilaterally [1][4][6]. Group 1: Court Ruling Details - The court found that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to impose tariffs, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs on multiple countries [2][6]. - The judges unanimously agreed that the President's claim of having unlimited tariff authority violates constitutional principles [7]. - The court issued a permanent injunction against the tariffs imposed in April and February, including additional tariffs on China following retaliatory measures [7][8]. Group 2: Implications and Reactions - The ruling is seen as a significant victory for those opposing arbitrary tariff imposition by the U.S. government [8]. - The decision does not affect tariffs imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, such as those on foreign-produced automobiles and steel and aluminum [8]. - Following the ruling, the White House has quickly appealed, indicating that the Supreme Court may review the case [8].