法院出手叫停 特朗普关税政策搁浅

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Court has blocked President Trump's tariff policy, ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing tariffs on countries with trade surpluses with the U.S. [2][4] Group 1: Court Ruling and Implications - The court's 49-page ruling prohibits the Trump administration from enforcing tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), stating that the Act does not grant the president the authority to issue global tariffs or retaliatory tariffs [4][5] - The ruling halts the implementation of a 10% universal tariff on most U.S. imports and certain tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada, but does not affect the 25% tariffs on the automotive and steel industries [4][6] - This ruling is considered one of the most significant judicial setbacks for the Trump administration, effectively nullifying the legal basis for the tariff strategy during his second term [6][7] Group 2: Future Trade Negotiations - The ruling complicates ongoing trade negotiations with approximately 18 countries, as the Trump administration has relied on the "reciprocal tariffs" as leverage [6][7] - Experts believe that the court's decision may lead trade partners to halt further concessions until there is a clearer legal framework from the U.S. judicial system regarding tariff disputes [7][8] Group 3: Potential Outcomes and Strategies - If the Trump administration's appeal is unsuccessful, it could significantly undermine the strategy of using high tariffs to compel trade partners to make concessions and reduce the trade deficit [8][9] - Analysts suggest that the administration may seek alternative legal avenues to impose tariffs, potentially using different legal justifications to circumvent the court's ruling [9]