从来就没有性压抑，只有文化压抑

Group 1 - The core argument presented is that the concept of "sexual repression" is a false narrative in the Chinese internet, suggesting that the real issue is "love repression" due to a lack of affection rather than sexual constraints [4][6][10] - The author agrees that the notion of sexual repression is a pseudo-concept, attributing it to a cultural narrative that simplifies complex social issues into sexual terms [5][11] - The discussion highlights that the perception of sexual repression does not align with the reality of sexual behavior in China, where the author argues that sexual activity is prevalent and not significantly repressed [6][9] Group 2 - The text suggests that the true essence of repression is cultural rather than sexual, indicating that societal expectations and traditional values drive individuals towards seeking stable family structures rather than purely sexual or romantic relationships [11] - The author posits that the desire for a "stable family" is often conflated with economic rationality, leading to a cultural conflict that manifests as what appears to be sexual repression [11] - The commentary also touches on the social dynamics of relationships, emphasizing that individuals often seek mutual affection and compatibility rather than merely pursuing sexual encounters [11][12]