“管理费与收益捆绑”时代来了！16位基金经理同台竞技，谁能封神

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is experiencing a resurgence in issuance, with 16 out of 26 newly approved floating fee rate funds entering the issuance period, marking the largest collective launch of active equity funds in nearly two years [2][3]. Group 1: Fund Manager Insights - The lineup of fund managers for the new products is impressive, featuring seasoned veterans, experienced mid-career professionals, and emerging talents [2][3]. - Notable fund managers include Wang Junzheng from Huaxia Fund and Yuan Hang from Penghua Fund, both with over 10 years of experience and annualized returns exceeding 10% [3]. - Mid-career managers such as Zhuang Chao from Huaxia Fund and Tian Junwei from Bosera Fund are also prominent, each with over 8 years of industry experience [3][4]. Group 2: Performance Disparities - There are significant performance disparities among fund managers, with some showing negative returns despite similar tenures [5]. - For instance, Huang Ding from Jiao Yin Shi Luo De Fund has a best tenure return rate of -0.89%, contrasting sharply with other managers like Bian Zheng from Huitianfu Fund, who achieved a 38.02% return [5]. - Experienced managers like Meng Jie from Manulife Fund face scrutiny as 11 out of 15 of his managed products have negative returns, including a -22.01% return for a fund managing over 700 million yuan [5][6]. Group 3: New Fee Mechanism - The floating fee rate product design aims to align management fees with investor returns, adjusting fees based on performance relative to benchmarks [7]. - If a fund underperforms by more than 3 percentage points, the management fee drops to 0.6% per year; if it outperforms by more than 6 percentage points, the fee can rise to 1.5% [7]. - This mechanism encourages long-term holding and aims to enhance the investor experience, shifting the standard for evaluating fund manager performance [7][8]. Group 4: Investor Considerations - Investors are advised to carefully assess fund managers' investment philosophies, historical performance stability, and risk control capabilities, especially in relation to the goals of floating fee rate products [8].