Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser

Core Argument - Google is urging a US judge to reject the proposal to spin off its Chrome browser, arguing that such a move would not effectively weaken its dominance in online search [1][6]. Legal Proceedings - The US District Court Judge Amit Mehta is considering remedies after determining that Google holds an illegal monopoly in search [2]. - Rival attorneys are advocating for Google to divest its Chrome browser and to be barred from exclusive agreements with partners like Apple and Samsung [3]. Testimonies and Evidence - Google's attorney, John Schmidtlein, stated that no evidence was presented indicating users would choose a different search engine if exclusivity deals were absent [4]. - During the trial, none of the witnesses expressed a desire to switch to Microsoft's Bing if given more flexibility [5]. Government's Position - The Department of Justice argues that Apple sought more flexibility in its agreements with Google but was denied, highlighting the restrictive nature of Google's practices [5]. - The US government is pushing for significant changes, including the potential sale of Google's Android operating system [6]. Competitive Landscape - The antitrust case against Google is occurring alongside the rise of generative artificial intelligence technologies from competitors like OpenAI and Microsoft, which are changing how users access information online [7][8]. - Google is heavily investing in AI to maintain its competitive edge in search and other online services [8].