Group 1 - The core argument of the article revolves around U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue, where he emphasized the so-called "China threat" to pressure allies to increase military spending [1][2] - Austin's speech highlighted the need for U.S. allies to enhance their defense budgets, citing that NATO members commit 5% of their GDP to defense, while Asian countries are reducing their defense expenditures [2][5] - Analysts suggest that Austin's strong rhetoric may serve as a distraction from negative publicity surrounding recent leaks and internal turmoil within the U.S. Defense Department [5][6] Group 2 - Austin's comments included a call for the U.S. to rebuild deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region through improved forward troop posture, assisting allies in strengthening their defense capabilities, and revitalizing the defense industrial base [2][5] - Following Austin's speech, a joint statement was issued by defense ministers from the U.S., Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, reiterating the "China threat" and committing to cooperation for a "free and open Indo-Pacific" [5][9] - The article notes that Austin's remarks reflect a commitment from the Trump administration to prioritize the Indo-Pacific region, although the actual actions taken by the administration will be closely scrutinized by Asian nations [9][10]
美防长在香格里拉对话会上大放厥词,分析人士:可能想转移外界注意力
Guan Cha Zhe Wang·2025-06-01 15:03