美国内打好反关税第一战，给特朗普一记响亮耳光，中方两部门表态

Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that Trump's tariff policy is illegal and invalid, exceeding the powers granted to the president under the International Economic and Political Economic Act [3] - This ruling applies to Trump's global "reciprocal tariff" policy but is not expected to affect tariffs on specific goods like automobiles and steel [3] - The lawsuit was initiated by a non-profit organization representing five small U.S. businesses adversely affected by the tariff policy, marking a significant legal challenge against Trump's tariffs [3][5] Group 2 - The ruling has energized critics of tariffs within the U.S., with legal experts calling it a major victory against harmful and illegal tariffs [3][5] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce responded by reiterating the court's ruling and criticizing the unilateral tariff measures, stating they have not resolved U.S. issues and have harmed international trade order [6] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasized that there are no winners in a trade war and that protectionism ultimately harms all parties involved [9][11] Group 3 - Trump's administration has appealed the court's decision, claiming the judges lack authority to dictate how to handle national emergencies [5] - The court's decision reflects a growing backlash against Trump's trade policies, which have faced opposition both domestically and internationally [11] - The situation illustrates the potential for U.S. legal frameworks to challenge unilateral trade actions, indicating a shift in the domestic response to Trump's tariffs [11]