“挂床住院”400多天、私自“放生”外来物种……最高法“点名”这些案例→

Group 1 - The case involves a traffic accident where the plaintiff, Yu, claimed compensation for 801 days of hospitalization, but 434 days were found to be "hanging bed" days without treatment [2][15][20] - The court determined that Yu's extended hospitalization was unjustified based on medical records, leading to a reduction in the claimed compensation [15][20][24] - The court emphasized the importance of honesty in civil activities and the negative impact of fraudulent claims on medical resources [24][25] Group 2 - The case highlights a growing trend of individuals seeking higher compensation through fraudulent hospitalization claims, which undermines the integrity of the legal system [22][24] - The court's ruling serves as a warning against dishonest practices in personal injury claims, reinforcing the need for evidence-based claims [24][25] - The ruling aligns with the principles outlined in the Civil Code, which mandates reasonable compensation for actual medical expenses incurred [15][24]