Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Huaxi Biological and Juzi Biological has escalated into a public confrontation over product integrity and industry standards, with both companies making serious allegations against each other regarding the authenticity of their products and testing methods [1][3][16]. Group 1: Company Actions and Statements - Huaxi Biological announced a capital relationship with Dr. Hao Yu, holding 32.4% of the shares in his company, and positioned it as an important member of the "Huaxi ecosystem," promising technical support and personal protection [1][6]. - Huaxi's statement accused Juzi Biological of manipulating public opinion and demanded that they address product integrity issues, threatening to disclose third-party testing evidence if they do not comply [1][7]. - Juzi Biological quickly countered by claiming that the testing agency used by Dr. Hao had not authorized him to use their report and accused Huaxi of maliciously distorting facts [9][12]. Group 2: Market Reactions and Financial Implications - Following the public dispute, Juzi Biological's stock price fell over 4.69%, while Huaxi Biological's stock rose by 6.94%, indicating market concerns about Juzi's upcoming performance during the critical "618" shopping festival [2][12]. - Juzi's flagship product, "Collagen Stick," is projected to generate 3.6 billion yuan in revenue in 2024, raising concerns about the impact of the ongoing controversy on consumer trust and potential sales [2][14]. - In contrast, Huaxi Biological reported a revenue decline of 11.61% year-on-year for 2024, with a net profit drop of 70.59%, highlighting the financial pressures both companies are facing [15]. Group 3: Industry Context and Future Outlook - The dispute reflects a broader competition between two technological routes in the medical beauty industry: the hyaluronic acid camp represented by Huaxi Biological and the recombinant collagen camp represented by Juzi Biological [14][16]. - The market for collagen-based skincare products is expected to surpass that of hyaluronic acid by 2026, with a compound annual growth rate of 52.6%, attracting numerous companies to enter the sector [14]. - The ongoing conflict may lead to increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies, as the lack of clear testing standards for recombinant collagen has resulted in divergent claims from both companies [9][11].